Photos, Videos, Sound     Book Reviews    
By Tom Hanna, 3 years and 5 months ago

Bob Smither on the Fair Tax

Bob Smither has an excellent analysis of the benefits of the Fair Tax, which he supports. He takes special note of the thing I like most about the proposal - the fact that it puts the true and full cost of government in every voters face with every retail transaction:

The part of what we now buy that is actually someone else’s income, FICA, property, or corporate tax is about 48%. The federal take of this is about 22%. This is the only real tax that is collected - it is the only tax that cannot be passed along to others. As our state chair, Pat Dixon has observed, all the acrimonious debate about taxes only decides who collects the taxes, not who pays them.

Imagine if every American were to suddenly become aware of this fact! The Fair Tax makes this truth of economic life clearly visible to every consumer.

No longer would statists be able to pander to the voters with promises to tax someone else for promised government services. We would all know exactly who pays (all of us) and exactly what government is costing us. We would all know that the burden falls on everyone, as it already does, even if few of us realize it.

Any new government spending would have to come from the economic health of the economy, from increased revenues, or from a hike in the sales tax. No one could claim that the burden will be shifted to someone else.

Every cut in the size of government would immediately translate into more money in everyone’s pocket.

Why would anyone be a Democrat except to soak the rich? Why would anyone be a Republican except to seek protection from the Democrats?

Ah and if you're asking «Who is Bob Smithers?» - He's the non-Democrat, anti-Pelosi candidate for Tom DeLay's old House seat.

Bob’s Campaign » Blog Archive » Fair Tax Talk

Bob Smither,Fair Tax,Tom DeLay


2 comments

Gravatar #1. Mark Curran
2 years ago

I dont see how Fairtax can work as advertised. I wish it could.

For one thing — Fairtax is a tax on the federal government, by the federal government.

This just isn't some novel book keeping technique - Fairtax actually depends on collecting about 300 billion in tax, from the federal government, to pay for the federal government.

Boortz writes «the federal government itself becomes a major taxpayer» Page 148.

The federal government a major taxpayer? To itself?.

That's like the guy who decides he needs to make some big money. So he pays himself 10,000 dollars a day to cut his own grass.

Yes, he could write himself a check every day for 10,000 dollars. He can even deposit the check in his own account. But at the end of the month, he won't have 300,000 dollars..

Incredibly, Fairtax thinks they will have 300,000. Well — they pretend they have 300 billion. But they won't.

For example, when the Fairtax makes the US Navy pay 4 billion in «sales tax» on a 12 billion dollar aircraft carrier — the Navy can write the check, The Treasury can even deposit the check.

But the Treasury isnt 4 billion dollars ahead. The treasury had to issue the money to cover the check it cashed.

But Fairtax thinks they are getting that 4 billion -- plus 296 other billions - from making «the federal goverment a major taxpayer.»

Because the Fairtax would collect 300 billion less in tax revenue -- it would have to raise the tax rates -- probably to about 35-38%.

If that was the ONLY fallacy of the Fairtax -- it would be enough to ruin the idea. But there are more fallacies -- of even greater impact.

Another major fallacy — Fairtax pretends it will be able to tax health care. Fairtax looks to tax the 2 trillion dollar health care industry — to the tune of getting people to cough up 460 Billion in taxes on their health care.

Will health care patients just pay this 460 billion? If Fair tax CAN NOT collect this tax, — they lose 460 Billion more in revenue, and the tax rate has to go up to 50-50% percent.

You decide if people will pay the US government 460 billion dollars in taxes, on their health care.

What will a cancer patient do, when just ONE patient gets a tax bill of 40,000 dollars on their surgery, chemo, and hospital bill?

What about when 15 million cancer patients open up all their medical bills, and see a 35-40% sales tax on there? Forget the percentages -- when they see 10,000 - 50,000 tax bills, on TOP of their 30,000- 150,000 medical bills?

What do you think nursing-home patient will say, or the famlies they see a 25,000 tax, per year, on their nursing home care?

What would the parents of an 8 year old leukemia victim say, when they see a «sales tax» bill of 70,000 dollars, on their effort to keep their child alive?. Suppose further that the parents only make 35,000 a year.

Its not like the hospital can waive the sales tax. Its not like insurance is going to pay it.

What will people say when they see their bills — second opinions are taxed — lab tests — taxed — ER visits — taxed. Dental care -taxed. Doctor visits — taxed. Knee replacement — taxed. Child birth — taxed.

The outcry from these folks will be like nothing US history has ever seen before.

Congress would quickly exempt health care expenses from a high sales tax.

If any Congressman dared to suggest the parents of a cancer victim should pay a sales tax — they wont be a congressmen very long.

So the rate would have to be adjusted up — from 35-40%, to 55-60%

My point is — you wont be ABLE to tax health care. The Congerss would exempt it. So thats 460 Billion the Fairtax budget is shy, just from that. And 300 billion shy, just from not being able to tax federal government either.

Now — what would RENTERS say when they have to pay this 40-60% sales tax, on THEIR RENT??

Of the 40 million renters in the USA - I bet not 12 individual renters know their taxes would skyrocket the moment this bill is passed. And wow, will they have a few words.

I could go on — car makers, new home builders, there would be major problems in all markets that are hit by this absurd tax.

Fairtax would come up over a trillion dollars SHORT on collecting 2.3 Trillion.

It won't work. Im sorry.

Gravatar #2. Tom Hanna
2 years ago

How is this different from the current situation with the income tax?

1 - We tax the income of federal employees and contractors. Is this just «pretending» that the government collected the tax?

2 - Why are Congressman able to suggest that we tax the income of the doctor who provides health care to a dying patient? Because the tax is hidden. Instead of the bill showing $50,000 for the doctor, with the tax on the doctor's income hidden, it will show $37,000 for the doctor and $11,100 tax. Absolutely there will be an outcry. The outcry is past due. That's the single biggest reason I'm in favor of the Fair Tax.

3 - Renters. They're currently taxed indirectly. They pay rent, their landlord pays income tax. They currently see $950 to the landlord and don't see the 25% income tax the landlord pays. When their rent is $730 plus $219, they'll see just what the portion is that goes for the product they want to pay for (a place to live) and what portion goes to pay for government. Outcry likely? Absolutely. That's the point.

Write a comment

If you want to add your comment on this post, simply fill out the next form:





* Required fields

You can use these XHTML tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>.

No trackbacks

To notify a mention on this post in your blog, enable automated notification (Options > Discussion in WordPress) or specify this trackback url: http://​www.tom-hanna.org/​wp-trackback.php?p=1234